Aix en Provence
Tournoi 2004-2005
Results by board
9 Dec 2004, 20:30 · 2 sessions, 2 tables
Session 1 – board 1 Dealer North · None vulnerable
North 4 HCP
- ♠ A 10 9 7 4
- ♥ 9 8
- ♦ 8 5
- ♣ 6 4 3 2
West 8 HCP
- ♠ 5
- ♥ Q 4 3
- ♦ K Q 9 6
- ♣ J 10 9 8 7
East 10 HCP
- ♠ J 6 2
- ♥ A K 10 7 6 2
- ♦ 7 2
- ♣ Q 5
South 18 HCP
- ♠ K Q 8 3
- ♥ J 5
- ♦ A J 10 4 3
- ♣ A K
Dealer North · None vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Hodent | Dupuis | 4♠ S +1 | 450 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +1.00 | -1.00 | ||
| 1 | 1 | Lambert | Laguarigue | 4♠ N = | 420 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -1.00 | +1.00 |
Session 1 – board 2 Dealer East · North-South vulnerable
North 7 HCP
- ♠ K 6 5
- ♥ A 8 7 3
- ♦ 10 9 5
- ♣ 9 7 3
West 9 HCP
- ♠ 10 8 3
- ♥ Q 5
- ♦ Q J 6
- ♣ K J 10 6 4
East 13 HCP
- ♠ A 4 2
- ♥ K 9 4 2
- ♦ A 8 4 3
- ♣ Q 5
South 11 HCP
- ♠ Q J 9 7
- ♥ J 10 6
- ♦ K 7 2
- ♣ A 8 2
Dealer East · North-South vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Hodent | Dupuis | 3♣ W −2 | 100 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +6.00 | -6.00 | ||
| 1 | 1 | Lambert | Laguarigue | 1NT W +1 | 120 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -6.00 | +6.00 |
Session 1 – board 3 Dealer South · East-West vulnerable
North 9 HCP
- ♠ 7 4 2
- ♥ 10 5
- ♦ A
- ♣ K Q 10 7 5 4 2
West 14 HCP
- ♠ K 8 5
- ♥ K 7 2
- ♦ K 7 6 2
- ♣ A J 3
East 12 HCP
- ♠ A Q 10 6
- ♥ A J 9
- ♦ J 8 5
- ♣ 9 8 6
South 5 HCP
- ♠ J 9 3
- ♥ Q 8 6 4 3
- ♦ Q 10 9 4 3
- ♣ —
Dealer South · East-West vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Lambert | Laguarigue | 4♠ E −4 | 400 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +14.00 | -14.00 | ||
| 1 | 2 | Hodent | Dupuis | 4♠ E = | 620 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -14.00 | +14.00 |
Session 1 – board 4 Dealer West · All vulnerable
North 7 HCP
- ♠ Q 5 4
- ♥ 5 2
- ♦ Q 9 7 3
- ♣ K 10 7 3
West 18 HCP
- ♠ A K 9 8 3
- ♥ K 9 8 6
- ♦ A
- ♣ A 8 5
East 6 HCP
- ♠ J
- ♥ Q 10 3
- ♦ J 10 6 5 4 2
- ♣ Q 9 2
South 9 HCP
- ♠ 10 7 6 2
- ♥ A J 7 4
- ♦ K 8
- ♣ J 6 4
Dealer West · All vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Hodent | Dupuis | 1♠ W +1 | 110 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +11.00 | -11.00 | ||
| 1 | 1 | Lambert | Laguarigue | 4♥ W = | 620 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -11.00 | +11.00 |
Session 1 – board 5 Dealer North · North-South vulnerable
North 11 HCP
- ♠ A K 8
- ♥ 9
- ♦ J 7 6 4
- ♣ Q J 9 7 4
West 8 HCP
- ♠ 9 5 4 2
- ♥ J 7 3
- ♦ A 10 9 5
- ♣ K 2
East 4 HCP
- ♠ Q 10 6 3
- ♥ 10 8 2
- ♦ Q 3 2
- ♣ 8 6 3
South 17 HCP
- ♠ J 7
- ♥ A K Q 6 5 4
- ♦ K 8
- ♣ A 10 5
Dealer North · North-South vulnerable
No table has recorded its score yet (out of 2 tables playing this board).
Session 1 – board 6 Dealer East · East-West vulnerable
North 13 HCP
- ♠ A 4
- ♥ K 10 9 7
- ♦ A 10 3
- ♣ Q 9 7 4
West 6 HCP
- ♠ K J 10 7 5 2
- ♥ J 4
- ♦ J 9 4
- ♣ 6 2
East 4 HCP
- ♠ Q 9 6 3
- ♥ Q 6 5 3 2
- ♦ 6 5 2
- ♣ 5
South 17 HCP
- ♠ 8
- ♥ A 8
- ♦ K Q 8 7
- ♣ A K J 10 8 3
Dealer East · East-West vulnerable
No table has recorded its score yet (out of 2 tables playing this board).
Session 1 – board 7 Dealer South · All vulnerable
North 10 HCP
- ♠ K Q 10
- ♥ 8 4
- ♦ J 6 4 3
- ♣ A 10 8 3
West 4 HCP
- ♠ A 9 7 6 5 3
- ♥ 10 6 5
- ♦ 2
- ♣ 9 7 4
East 14 HCP
- ♠ J 2
- ♥ K Q J 3 2
- ♦ Q 9
- ♣ K Q 5 2
South 12 HCP
- ♠ 8 4
- ♥ A 9 7
- ♦ A K 10 8 7 5
- ♣ J 6
Dealer South · All vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Lambert | Laguarigue | 3♦ S +1 | 130 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +6.00 | -6.00 | ||
| 1 | 2 | Hodent | Dupuis | 2♥ E = | 110 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -6.00 | +6.00 |
Session 1 – board 8 Dealer West · None vulnerable
North 10 HCP
- ♠ 10
- ♥ K J 9 8
- ♦ Q 7 5 3 2
- ♣ A 9 5
West 5 HCP
- ♠ J 8 6 5 2
- ♥ 7 6 5 4
- ♦ A 9
- ♣ 10 2
East 7 HCP
- ♠ K 9 4 3
- ♥ 10 2
- ♦ 10 6 4
- ♣ K J 7 4
South 18 HCP
- ♠ A Q 7
- ♥ A Q 3
- ♦ K J 8
- ♣ Q 8 6 3
Dealer West · None vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Lambert | Laguarigue | 3NT S +2 | 460 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| 1 | 2 | Hodent | Dupuis | 3NT S +2 | 460 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Session 2 – board 1 Dealer North · None vulnerable
North 12 HCP
- ♠ Q 8 5 2
- ♥ A K 3
- ♦ 6 4 2
- ♣ K 10 3
West 13 HCP
- ♠ A K
- ♥ 9 8 6 5
- ♦ A Q 10 7 3
- ♣ 6 2
East 8 HCP
- ♠ 9 7 6 4
- ♥ Q 4 2
- ♦ 9 8
- ♣ A Q 9 7
South 7 HCP
- ♠ J 10 3
- ♥ J 10 7
- ♦ K J 5
- ♣ J 8 5 4
Dealer North · None vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Lambert | Hodent | 2♦ W = | 90 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +1.00 | -1.00 | ||
| 1 | 2 | Laguarigue | Dupuis | 2♦ W +1 | 110 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -1.00 | +1.00 |
Session 2 – board 2 Dealer East · North-South vulnerable
North 1 HCP
- ♠ J 8 7 4 3
- ♥ 5 3
- ♦ 9 8 6
- ♣ 8 4 3
West 17 HCP
- ♠ Q 6
- ♥ K 8
- ♦ A J
- ♣ A Q J 7 6 5 2
East 14 HCP
- ♠ A 10 9 2
- ♥ A Q J 7
- ♦ K 7 5 4 2
- ♣ —
South 8 HCP
- ♠ K 5
- ♥ 10 9 6 4 2
- ♦ Q 10 3
- ♣ K 10 9
Dealer East · North-South vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Laguarigue | Dupuis | 6♦ E −2 | 100 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +11.00 | -11.00 | ||
| 1 | 1 | Lambert | Hodent | 3NT E +2 | 460 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -11.00 | +11.00 |
Session 2 – board 3 Dealer South · East-West vulnerable
North 6 HCP
- ♠ K 5
- ♥ J 10 7 6
- ♦ 8 7 4
- ♣ Q 9 7 2
West 10 HCP
- ♠ J 4 3
- ♥ A 9 5 2
- ♦ K Q
- ♣ 10 6 4 3
East 11 HCP
- ♠ A Q 9 8
- ♥ 8 4 3
- ♦ 5 3 2
- ♣ A J 5
South 13 HCP
- ♠ 10 7 6 2
- ♥ K Q
- ♦ A J 10 9 6
- ♣ K 8
Dealer South · East-West vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Lambert | Hodent | 1NT N +1 | 120 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| 1 | 2 | Laguarigue | Dupuis | 1NT N +1 | 120 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Session 2 – board 4 Dealer West · All vulnerable
North 16 HCP
- ♠ A 10 6 5
- ♥ K 7 3
- ♦ K Q 5
- ♣ A 8 4
West 10 HCP
- ♠ J 9 7 4
- ♥ Q 9 8
- ♦ A 10 6
- ♣ K 7 3
East 5 HCP
- ♠ 3 2
- ♥ J 5 4
- ♦ J 9 4
- ♣ Q J 10 9 2
South 9 HCP
- ♠ K Q 8
- ♥ A 10 6 2
- ♦ 8 7 3 2
- ♣ 6 5
Dealer West · All vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Laguarigue | Dupuis | 3NT N = | 600 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +10.00 | -10.00 | ||
| 1 | 1 | Lambert | Hodent | 2NT N = | 120 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -10.00 | +10.00 |
Session 2 – board 5 Dealer North · North-South vulnerable
North 14 HCP
- ♠ A 5 2
- ♥ K 8
- ♦ A Q 10 7 4
- ♣ J 10 3
West 6 HCP
- ♠ J 7 6 4
- ♥ Q 5 3
- ♦ K 6 5
- ♣ 9 6 2
East 9 HCP
- ♠ Q 10 9 3
- ♥ 10 9 4
- ♦ 9 8 3
- ♣ A K 7
South 11 HCP
- ♠ K 8
- ♥ A J 7 6 2
- ♦ J 2
- ♣ Q 8 5 4
Dealer North · North-South vulnerable
No table has recorded its score yet (out of 2 tables playing this board).
Session 2 – board 6 Dealer East · East-West vulnerable
North 7 HCP
- ♠ J 4 2
- ♥ 10 4 3
- ♦ A J 6 3
- ♣ J 7 6
West 13 HCP
- ♠ 8 6
- ♥ A K J 9 8 6
- ♦ K Q 8 5
- ♣ 10
East 12 HCP
- ♠ A K 9 5
- ♥ Q 2
- ♦ 9 2
- ♣ K 9 5 4 3
South 8 HCP
- ♠ Q 10 7 3
- ♥ 7 5
- ♦ 10 7 4
- ♣ A Q 8 2
Dealer East · East-West vulnerable
No table has recorded its score yet (out of 2 tables playing this board).
Session 2 – board 7 Dealer South · All vulnerable
North 9 HCP
- ♠ K 6
- ♥ K 9 8 7 5
- ♦ K 5
- ♣ 10 6 5 2
West 7 HCP
- ♠ Q 10 7 5
- ♥ 6 4 2
- ♦ A J 10 8 6
- ♣ 7
East 5 HCP
- ♠ J 9 8 4 3
- ♥ 10 3
- ♦ 2
- ♣ A 9 8 4 3
South 19 HCP
- ♠ A 2
- ♥ A Q J
- ♦ Q 9 7 4 3
- ♣ K Q J
Dealer South · All vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Laguarigue | Dupuis | 3NT S +2 | 660 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +13.00 | -13.00 | ||
| 1 | 1 | Lambert | Hodent | 4♥ N −1 | 100 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -13.00 | +13.00 |
Session 2 – board 8 Dealer West · None vulnerable
North 12 HCP
- ♠ K 5 2
- ♥ Q J 7
- ♦ J 10 4
- ♣ A J 7 3
West 10 HCP
- ♠ J
- ♥ A 10 5 4
- ♦ Q 9 7 6 2
- ♣ K 10 4
East 5 HCP
- ♠ Q 10 9 8 4 3
- ♥ K 8 3 2
- ♦ 5 3
- ♣ 2
South 13 HCP
- ♠ A 7 6
- ♥ 9 6
- ♦ A K 8
- ♣ Q 9 8 6 5
Dealer West · None vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Laguarigue | Dupuis | 3NT N +1 | 430 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +7.00 | -7.00 | ||
| 1 | 1 | Lambert | Hodent | 1NT S +2 | 150 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -7.00 | +7.00 |