Aix en Provence
Tournoi 2014-2015
Results by board
7 Jun 2015, 20:30 · 2 sessions, 2 tables
Session 1 – board 1 Dealer North · None vulnerable
North 5 HCP
- ♠ Q 9
- ♥ K 10 9 5
- ♦ 7 4 3 2
- ♣ 8 5 2
West 10 HCP
- ♠ J 7 6 5 4 2
- ♥ A Q 7 6
- ♦ K
- ♣ 4 3
East 19 HCP
- ♠ A K
- ♥ J 3 2
- ♦ A Q 10 8 6
- ♣ A J 6
South 6 HCP
- ♠ 10 8 3
- ♥ 8 4
- ♦ J 9 5
- ♣ K Q 10 9 7
Dealer North · None vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Chenevier | Hodent F. - Grabowski | 4♥ W = | 2♣ | 420 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +1.00 | -1.00 | |
| 1 | 2 | Phelip | d'Illiers | 3NT E +2 | 10♣ | 460 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -1.00 | +1.00 |
Session 1 – board 2 Dealer East · North-South vulnerable
North 2 HCP
- ♠ 8 6 5 3 2
- ♥ 8 4
- ♦ Q 10 6 3
- ♣ 8 2
West 20 HCP
- ♠ K
- ♥ A K Q 9 6 3
- ♦ 7
- ♣ A K J 9 6
East 9 HCP
- ♠ Q J 10 9 7 4
- ♥ 7 5
- ♦ A 9 2
- ♣ Q 3
South 9 HCP
- ♠ A
- ♥ J 10 2
- ♦ K J 8 5 4
- ♣ 10 7 5 4
Dealer East · North-South vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Chenevier | Hodent F. - Grabowski | 6NT W = | 10♦ | 990 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 1 | 2 | Phelip | d'Illiers | 6NT W = | 8♠ | 990 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Session 1 – board 3 Dealer South · East-West vulnerable
North 13 HCP
- ♠ A 10 5
- ♥ Q 8 3 2
- ♦ K 4 2
- ♣ A 6 5
West 10 HCP
- ♠ K J 9 7
- ♥ A 6 5 4
- ♦ J 6 3
- ♣ J 7
East 5 HCP
- ♠ Q 6 3 2
- ♥ 9 7
- ♦ 9 5
- ♣ K 10 9 8 2
South 12 HCP
- ♠ 8 4
- ♥ K J 10
- ♦ A Q 10 8 7
- ♣ Q 4 3
Dealer South · East-West vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Chenevier | Hodent F. - Grabowski | 3NT S +2 | 10♠ | 460 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +1.00 | -1.00 | |
| 1 | 2 | Phelip | d'Illiers | 3NT S +1 | 10♣ | 430 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -1.00 | +1.00 |
Session 1 – board 4 Dealer West · All vulnerable
North 14 HCP
- ♠ A K 4 3
- ♥ 9
- ♦ J 7 6 3
- ♣ A Q 9 2
West 6 HCP
- ♠ 8 5 2
- ♥ Q 5 3
- ♦ A 9 5 4
- ♣ 8 6 5
East 4 HCP
- ♠ 10 9 6
- ♥ 10 2
- ♦ 10 8 2
- ♣ K J 10 4 3
South 16 HCP
- ♠ Q J 7
- ♥ A K J 8 7 6 4
- ♦ K Q
- ♣ 7
Dealer West · All vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Chenevier | Hodent F. - Grabowski | 4♥ S +1 | 10♠ | 650 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +13.00 | -13.00 | |
| 1 | 2 | Phelip | d'Illiers | 6♥ S −1 | 100 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -13.00 | +13.00 |
Session 1 – board 5 Dealer North · North-South vulnerable
North 17 HCP
- ♠ A 10 3 2
- ♥ 3
- ♦ K Q J
- ♣ A K 6 4 3
West 10 HCP
- ♠ K 6 5
- ♥ K Q 10 8 6
- ♦ 10 7 5
- ♣ Q 5
East 6 HCP
- ♠ J 9 4
- ♥ J 9 7
- ♦ A 9 8 6 4
- ♣ 9 8
South 7 HCP
- ♠ Q 8 7
- ♥ A 5 4 2
- ♦ 3 2
- ♣ J 10 7 2
Dealer North · North-South vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Phelip | d'Illiers | 3NT S = | K♥ | 600 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +10.00 | -10.00 | |
| 1 | 1 | Chenevier | Hodent F. - Grabowski | 3♣ N +2 | 150 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -10.00 | +10.00 |
Session 1 – board 6 Dealer East · East-West vulnerable
North 8 HCP
- ♠ 4 2
- ♥ A 9 8
- ♦ J 8 7
- ♣ Q J 9 8 4
West 12 HCP
- ♠ A 8
- ♥ 5 2
- ♦ K Q 10 5 4 3
- ♣ K 10 2
East 18 HCP
- ♠ K Q 10 5 3
- ♥ K Q 10
- ♦ A 6
- ♣ A 7 3
South 2 HCP
- ♠ J 9 7 6
- ♥ J 7 6 4 3
- ♦ 9 2
- ♣ 6 5
Dealer East · East-West vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Chenevier | Hodent F. - Grabowski | 3NT E +3 | 4♥ | 690 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 1 | 2 | Phelip | d'Illiers | 3NT E +3 | 4♥ | 690 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Session 1 – board 7 Dealer South · All vulnerable
North 10 HCP
- ♠ Q 9 8 7
- ♥ A 5 4 2
- ♦ 8 7
- ♣ A 6 5
West 7 HCP
- ♠ J 10 5
- ♥ Q J 10 9 3
- ♦ Q J 9 3
- ♣ 4
East 6 HCP
- ♠ A 4 2
- ♥ 8 7 6
- ♦ 10 6 2
- ♣ Q 10 8 2
South 17 HCP
- ♠ K 6 3
- ♥ K
- ♦ A K 5 4
- ♣ K J 9 7 3
Dealer South · All vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Chenevier | Hodent F. - Grabowski | 3NT N +1 | 8♥ | 630 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 1 | 2 | Phelip | d'Illiers | 3NT S +1 | Q♥ | 630 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Session 1 – board 8 Dealer West · None vulnerable
North 3 HCP
- ♠ Q 10 8 2
- ♥ 10 9
- ♦ 10 6 3 2
- ♣ J 6 5
West 15 HCP
- ♠ A J 5
- ♥ A 8 5 4 2
- ♦ Q 8
- ♣ A 9 3
East 8 HCP
- ♠ 9 7 3
- ♥ K Q J 7
- ♦ 7
- ♣ Q 8 7 4 2
South 14 HCP
- ♠ K 6 4
- ♥ 6 3
- ♦ A K J 9 5 4
- ♣ K 10
Dealer West · None vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Chenevier | Hodent F. - Grabowski | 4♥ W −1 | 10♦ | 50 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 1 | 2 | Phelip | d'Illiers | 4♥ W −1 | 10♠ | 50 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Session 2 – board 1 Dealer North · None vulnerable
North 9 HCP
- ♠ 5
- ♥ J 10 8 3
- ♦ J 10 5 2
- ♣ A K 6 3
West 7 HCP
- ♠ Q 10 9 8 4 3
- ♥ Q
- ♦ K 9 4
- ♣ 9 5 2
East 9 HCP
- ♠ A 7 6
- ♥ A 6 4
- ♦ 8 6 3
- ♣ J 10 7 4
South 15 HCP
- ♠ K J 2
- ♥ K 9 7 5 2
- ♦ A Q 7
- ♣ Q 8
Dealer North · None vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Chenevier | Phelip | 4♥ S = | 420 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| 1 | 2 | Hodent F. - Grabowski | d'Illiers | 4♥ S = | 10♠ | 420 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Session 2 – board 2 Dealer East · North-South vulnerable
North 11 HCP
- ♠ A K 5 3
- ♥ 8 7 5 4
- ♦ 7
- ♣ A 8 5 3
West 9 HCP
- ♠ 8 2
- ♥ A K 10 9 6 3 2
- ♦ Q 3
- ♣ 10 2
East 6 HCP
- ♠ J 9 7
- ♥ J
- ♦ A 10 9 8 5 4 2
- ♣ 7 6
South 14 HCP
- ♠ Q 10 6 4
- ♥ Q
- ♦ K J 6
- ♣ K Q J 9 4
Dealer East · North-South vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Chenevier | Phelip | 4♠ N +1 | 650 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| 1 | 2 | Hodent F. - Grabowski | d'Illiers | 4♠ N +1 | 650 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Session 2 – board 3 Dealer South · East-West vulnerable
North 8 HCP
- ♠ J 7
- ♥ A 8 7 5 3 2
- ♦ K 7 5 4
- ♣ 9
West 11 HCP
- ♠ K 10 5
- ♥ 6 4
- ♦ Q J 8 6
- ♣ A J 6 2
East 11 HCP
- ♠ 9 2
- ♥ K J 9
- ♦ A 10 2
- ♣ K 10 7 4 3
South 10 HCP
- ♠ A Q 8 6 4 3
- ♥ Q 10
- ♦ 9 3
- ♣ Q 8 5
Dealer South · East-West vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Hodent F. - Grabowski | d'Illiers | 2♠ S −1 | 10♣ | 50 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +2.00 | -2.00 | |
| 1 | 1 | Chenevier | Phelip | 2♠ S −2 | Q♦ | 100 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -2.00 | +2.00 |
Session 2 – board 4 Dealer West · All vulnerable
North 9 HCP
- ♠ K 10 6 2
- ♥ 9 5
- ♦ 10 6 3
- ♣ A Q 7 3
West 15 HCP
- ♠ A 9
- ♥ Q J 8 4
- ♦ A J 5
- ♣ K 10 6 2
East 9 HCP
- ♠ Q 7 5 3
- ♥ A 10 6 2
- ♦ K 7 2
- ♣ 8 4
South 7 HCP
- ♠ J 8 4
- ♥ K 7 3
- ♦ Q 9 8 4
- ♣ J 9 5
Dealer West · All vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Hodent F. - Grabowski | d'Illiers | 3♥ E −1 | 10♠ | 100 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +7.00 | -7.00 | |
| 1 | 1 | Chenevier | Phelip | 3♥ E +1 | 10♣ | 170 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -7.00 | +7.00 |
Session 2 – board 5 Dealer North · North-South vulnerable
North 13 HCP
- ♠ K Q J 6
- ♥ 6 4
- ♦ Q 10 9 7 4
- ♣ K Q
West 5 HCP
- ♠ 9 5 3 2
- ♥ J 9 2
- ♦ 6 3
- ♣ A 5 4 2
East 12 HCP
- ♠ A 10 7
- ♥ K 5 3
- ♦ A 8 2
- ♣ J 10 8 3
South 10 HCP
- ♠ 8 4
- ♥ A Q 10 8 7
- ♦ K J 5
- ♣ 9 7 6
Dealer North · North-South vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Hodent F. - Grabowski | d'Illiers | 2♥ S = | 10♣ | 110 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +9.00 | -9.00 | |
| 1 | 1 | Chenevier | Phelip | 3NT N −3 | 10♣ | 300 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -9.00 | +9.00 |
Session 2 – board 6 Dealer East · East-West vulnerable
North 18 HCP
- ♠ A 8 6 5
- ♥ A 4
- ♦ —
- ♣ A K Q J 10 6 5
West 9 HCP
- ♠ J 4
- ♥ K Q 9 6 3
- ♦ K 8 4 3
- ♣ 7 3
East 8 HCP
- ♠ 9 7 2
- ♥ J 10 8 7 5
- ♦ A Q J
- ♣ 4 2
South 5 HCP
- ♠ K Q 10 3
- ♥ 2
- ♦ 10 9 7 6 5 2
- ♣ 9 8
Dealer East · East-West vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Hodent F. - Grabowski | d'Illiers | 4♠ S +3 | K♥ | 510 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +8.00 | -8.00 | |
| 1 | 1 | Chenevier | Phelip | 3♣ N +4 | 10♠ | 190 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -8.00 | +8.00 |
Session 2 – board 7 Dealer South · All vulnerable
North 6 HCP
- ♠ J 6 3
- ♥ K 8 2
- ♦ 7 5 3
- ♣ Q 8 4 3
West 11 HCP
- ♠ K 9 7
- ♥ A 6 5 4 3
- ♦ 10 8
- ♣ K J 10
East 14 HCP
- ♠ A 10 8 5 4
- ♥ Q 9
- ♦ A K J 6
- ♣ 5 2
South 9 HCP
- ♠ Q 2
- ♥ J 10 7
- ♦ Q 9 4 2
- ♣ A 9 7 6
Dealer South · All vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Hodent F. - Grabowski | d'Illiers | 4♠ E −1 | 10♦ | 100 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +12.00 | -12.00 | |
| 1 | 1 | Chenevier | Phelip | 4♠ E = | 620 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -12.00 | +12.00 |
Session 2 – board 8 Dealer West · None vulnerable
North 13 HCP
- ♠ A J 7 2
- ♥ K Q 9 6
- ♦ K 9 6
- ♣ 8 5
West 9 HCP
- ♠ Q 9 4
- ♥ A
- ♦ Q 8 5
- ♣ J 10 7 4 3 2
East 8 HCP
- ♠ K 10 6
- ♥ J 10 7 5 3
- ♦ A 10 7 3 2
- ♣ —
South 10 HCP
- ♠ 8 5 3
- ♥ 8 4 2
- ♦ J 4
- ♣ A K Q 9 6
Dealer West · None vulnerable
2 tables have recorded their score (out of 2 tables playing this board).
| Round | Table | North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | NS score | EW score | NS % | EW % | NS IMP | EW IMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Hodent F. - Grabowski | d'Illiers | 2NT N −1 | 10♥ | 50 | 100.00 | 0.00 | +14.00 | -14.00 | |
| 1 | 1 | Chenevier | Phelip | 5♣X N −5 | 1100 | 0.00 | 100.00 | -14.00 | +14.00 |